|
IN THIS ISSUE:
Marketing from the Bottom
Twitter Q&A with MountainOne's Liz Bissell
Slicing and Dicing the Marketing Budget
Marketing from the Bottom
Scott Mills, president of WMA
“It has been a difficult task to balance survival while also still trying to maintain engagement with customers, employees, suppliers, partners and prospects,” so writes a friend who leads a technology company. He cites the lack of resources for not being able to release a new product, attend a key tradeshow or even update company and product materials. Hence, the theme of this newsletter is “marketing from the bottom.”
This economy, as with previous contractions, has everyone looking at marketing budgets more cautiously and evaluating the effectiveness of each program. (Jerry Goldstein’s column contains some excellent market data on spending and allocation ranges for different areas.) What is unusual about this slump is the emergence and acceptance of social media. Everyone is watching and determining how to effectively incorporate an appropriate level within their marketing programs. We are seeing, however, companies blindly jumping into social media without a strategy or long-term commitment.
Read the entire article at fintechmarketing.com.
Twitter Q&A with MountainOne's Liz Bissell
WMA recently co-presented a Bankerstuff.com Webinar on the Banking Twittersphere with Liz Bissell, vice presi dent of Marketing for MountainOne Financial Partners. The Webinar went so well, WMA's Blair Logan asked Bisell to sit down for a few more questions about
financial institution's use of Twitter.
Logan: How long has MountainOne Financial Partners been on Twitter?
Bissell: We've officially been using Twitter since April 2009. I've been using Twitter personally since January 2009 - learning all of its dos and don'ts, tricks, techniques, etc.
Logan: What precipitated your decision to use Twitter?
Bissell: We first began considering the use of several forms of social media for our company after I attended an Economist Conference focused on this topic. I was especially intrigued by the stories/recommendations of other banks already using these tools to their benefit. Following that conference, scores of Webinars, conferences and white papers sprang up, also devoted to this topic, several of which I attended to learn more. We then chose the social media applications that we felt would work best for our company and would be manageable from a time consideration, and Twitter is one of them.
Read the entire interview at fintechmarketing.com
|
WMA in the News
"PR Insight: Press coverage can drive member growth"
CUES
August 7, 2009
"IMN Announces Partnership with William Mills Agency"
PR-inside.com
August 11, 2009
New on SlideShare
An SEO Primer
(For companies that want to be found)
Follow WMA On
Financial Media Intel
Industry Event Updates
Tips On Marketing And
Selling To Banks
twitter.com/wmagency
FinTech Marketing Blog
Financial PR and marketing expert Scott Mills leads discussions on marketing and selling to financial institutions
fintechmarketing.com
Industry Events
WMA will be supporting clients at these upcoming events:
AFP 2009 Annual Conference
October 4-7, 2009
San Francisco
MBA Annual
October 11-14, 2009
San Diego
BAI Retail Delivery
November 3-5, 2009
Boston
|
|
How to Slice and Dice a Sales and Marketing Budget
Jerry Goldstein, vice president of WMA
Last month, in my article titled, “How Much Should You Spend On Marketing” explored sales and marketing budgeting benchmarks based on an analysis of 2008 financial data from 32 publicly-held FinTech companies. This analysis revealed that, on average, 22% of their revenues were budgeted for sales and marketing. While this may not be the magic number for every small-to-mid sized technology company, it is still a necessary management exercise to determine how much should be allocated to specific programs.
Most companies allocate budgets as a percent of revenue, but regardless of percentage, it is important to allocate funds to achieve optimum results for the investment. There is, however, never enough to do everything you would like to do, or that would benefit the company. So, whatever the overall amount, what part of the total should go into sales versus other marketing initiatives? How much should go to marketing programs versus staff? And then, how much should be directed to “traditional” marketing versus the newer digital marketing media?
Before budgeting, a productive exercise is to clearly define the roles of sales and marketing. These include:
1. Creating awareness
2. Building the brand and establishing credibility
3. Prospecting
4. Closing the sale
5. Validating the value (for future growth)
The Devil is in the Allocation
One of the biggest and most frequent budgeting mistakes is unwise allocation of resources. An effective sales program is essential, but its primary role is to close sales. It makes little business sense for a new or unknown company to fund a cross-country cold call to make a “prospect” aware of the company and its products. Likewise, generating leads without an effective follow-up program is a sad waste of resources.
The ideal program is one that skillfully balances marketing initiatives to fit the unique characteristics and sales cycle of the marketplace it serves. In financial technology marketing this means building awareness and credibility; being visible (both traditionally and digitally) whenever a suspect turns into a prospect; skillfully navigating the closing of the sale; and continually building the brand for competitive reasons and long-term growth.
Traditional marketing initiatives include public relations, media advertising, sales collateral, events (such as trade shows) and direct marketing. A new layer of marketing initiatives that can add even more complexity to budgeting is digital marketing, which includes such elements as your Web site, Web site optimization, e-marketing and communications such as e-newsletters and e-mail campaigns and social media.
International Data Corporation (IDC) conducted a study of more than 100 business-to-business technology companies to determine typical ratios for marketing programs. The IDC study provides useful benchmarks for larger companies. Our agency has examined the IDC numbers and projected the ideal budget for smaller organizations with revenues between $5 and $10 million.
For companies of this size, a good starting benchmark is 25% to 30% of revenues devoted to sales and marketing, with sales receiving two-thirds of this budget and marketing one-third. Of the overall marketing budget, companies should invest the majority, 70% to 75%, in programs that create awareness, build the brand and generate prospects.
Our recommended allocation of the marketing program budget is:
Public Relations
|
22-28%
|
| Direct Marketing |
20-25% |
Events
|
12-15% |
Digital Marketing
|
10-12% |
| Sales Collateral |
8-10% |
| Advertising |
6-10% |
Marketing Automation
|
3-4% |
Every sales and marketing initiative has a unique role to play in a successful company’s business plan and should not be dismissed or trivialized. To recognize this and allocate available resources skillfully is essential to a successful business plan.
This article was also posted online at fintechmarketing.com.
|